5 Comments
User's avatar
Owen Kinnan's avatar

And there it is. Connections with the Soros network. What else does one need to know?

Fred C Lupher's avatar

Does locking the press out of a meeting with a George Soros backed organization raise any red flags? The "Indivisible Nebraskan's" organization tried to become invisible when plotting strategies that NE voters wouldn't approve of. The same organization that has supported socialist candidates are supporting Dan Osborn. But hush, don't let the truth out. Let's keep it behind closed doors because Dan is smart enough to know that isn't what NE voters want. Accusing a man of being the town idiot because he's wearing a t-shirt you don't like? Certainly not illegal like so many things you have done, but it is childish pettiness Dan.

Andrew L Sullivan's avatar

Democracy requires a free press. Will legacy news media admit to any of this let alone cover it? By now, the evidence is quite clear. Totalitarian tactics are afoot.

Mindy F.'s avatar

I'm always skeptical of politicians who talk a big game like Osborn. With the exception of Trump, who talked a big game during his campaign and then followed through on a lot of his promises, most politicians end up falling in line and folding. It also tells me they're not genuine. Osborn comes across as an imposter to me. "Ooh, look at me, I'm a tough guy who's going to fight!" Yeah, no

Ed Johnson's avatar

Apparently the Labor and Working-Class Networks are opposed to a free press learning about Dan Osborn. I wonder how many Nebraska laborers and workers actually want to suppress the facts about Dan Osborn.