4 Comments
User's avatar
Fred C Lupher's avatar

What does it say about a candidate who uses an organization to gather signatures that was previously caught for fraud? Lapse of judgement or lack of research? Then using pejoratives to accuse your opponents of ineptness while you yourself failed at the most fundamental step: hiring a reputable organization to get legitimate signatures. So, since you failed using the conventional route, try an end around.

David Brady's avatar

I was hoping Brent Lindstrom doctrine would contain specific conservative goals. It is nothing about fluff. My interpretation is that it is wide-open for anyone and everyone to think that he has no clue. And that’s too bad because we need someone to take the bull by the horns to reduce the School lobby influence in this state in this legislature #1 and number two to Re-address property taxes. Property taxes are outrageous. Local governments are gearing up to increase such taxes as much as they can before this November election. I will vote for pill and only because he has expressed his desire to lower property taxes. I have not seen my valuation go down or seen my property taxes Decrease yet. But there is hope, and quite frankly pill is our only hope at this point. The school lobby is strong and I hope and pray we can get something done for Nebraska citizens. That’s where Lindstrom has lost it.

J. Neal Ferry's avatar

Brent is doing what is good and great, putting the State of Nebraska first. If you have not read the Nebraska Doctrine, take the time to understand it. I’d call him Nebraska’s bravest native son.

Mindy F.'s avatar

Yes, I was very impressed by his doctrine. Just wish he had run the right way in the first place so he could have had a chance at winning