Dan Osborn is still the same Democrat Dan that tried to pass himself off to Nebraska voters as an independent. I hope Nebraska voters are not fooled by this obvious ploy.
This guy has yet to state any policy position that even seems middle of the road, much less at least moderately. Not much "independent" thinking going on.
Dan, packing the supreme court is a little bit bigger deal than having a second mechanic helping you tighten a bolt. We have enough secret recordings of your socialist comments to know where you stand, but there have been closed-door meetings with left-wing activists, so we don't know exactly how extreme your socialist views are. Dan, you should be smart enough to know that banning the press from closed-door meetings raises a giant red flag. You have been caught saying things in private (so you thought) that are the exact opposite of what you say in public. That's because you know Nebraskans wouldn't consider voting for you if you make your true ideology public. Nebraskans don't want to send a wolf in sheep's clothing to Washington DC.
Anyone else notice that when Supreme Court rulings go in favor of progressive causes the Democrats are quiet about expanding/ packing the court? But then, when the rulings go against what they want, all the sudden they bring out the torches and pitchforks and say the Court needs to be reformed? But sure Democrats and "independent" Dan, keep telling yourselves it's for "balancing" the Court. Your sheep will keep eating it up
Dan Osborn is still the same Democrat Dan that tried to pass himself off to Nebraska voters as an independent. I hope Nebraska voters are not fooled by this obvious ploy.
This guy has yet to state any policy position that even seems middle of the road, much less at least moderately. Not much "independent" thinking going on.
Dan, packing the supreme court is a little bit bigger deal than having a second mechanic helping you tighten a bolt. We have enough secret recordings of your socialist comments to know where you stand, but there have been closed-door meetings with left-wing activists, so we don't know exactly how extreme your socialist views are. Dan, you should be smart enough to know that banning the press from closed-door meetings raises a giant red flag. You have been caught saying things in private (so you thought) that are the exact opposite of what you say in public. That's because you know Nebraskans wouldn't consider voting for you if you make your true ideology public. Nebraskans don't want to send a wolf in sheep's clothing to Washington DC.
A lot of personal pronoun use in his answer.
Anyone else notice that when Supreme Court rulings go in favor of progressive causes the Democrats are quiet about expanding/ packing the court? But then, when the rulings go against what they want, all the sudden they bring out the torches and pitchforks and say the Court needs to be reformed? But sure Democrats and "independent" Dan, keep telling yourselves it's for "balancing" the Court. Your sheep will keep eating it up